Skip to content
CRIS

FOR BILLING & RCM OPERATIONS

Stop letting claims sit, denials age and follow-up work disappear into spreadsheets.

Revenue-cycle teams manage hundreds or thousands of accounts at different stages every day.

When that work is spread across reports, spreadsheets, payer portals, notes, inboxes and individual staff members, it becomes difficult to know what needs attention first.

CRIS helps billing and revenue-cycle teams turn that daily workload into organised, visible and accountable work.

Know what is waiting. Know why. Know who owns it. Know what happens next.

See the daily work CRIS brings together

Some claims are waiting to be submitted.

Some have been rejected.

Some have been denied.

Some have been paid only partly.

Some need an appeal.

Some need another follow-up.

Some are becoming too old.

And some simply have no clear next action.

My WorkNeeds Attention Today
Updated 8:45 AM
Due Today34$286K affected
Overdue186 high priority
New Denials27$174K denied value
Appeals114 due within 48h
90+ Day A/R$486K72 accounts
AccountIssueOwnerDueBalance
CLM-483920Denied · DocumentationJordan Blake10:30 AM$18,420
CLM-482177A/R follow-up · 96 daysEmily Carter11:15 AM$52,400
APL-11854Appeal follow-upSarah Mitchell1:00 PM$31,870
CLM-481066Payment received · balance openMichael Johnson3:30 PM$9,650
01Know what is waiting.
02Know why.
03Know who owns it.
04Know what happens next.

See the work that needs attention today.

Instead of expecting users to search through multiple reports, CRIS can help organise work around what needs action.

The objective is simple:

Make it difficult for important work to disappear.

Read the full daily-work context

Every unresolved claim should have a clear next step.

A claim should not disappear into a worklist simply because it has been touched once.

At any point, an RCM user should be able to answer:

Where is this claim now?

What is holding it up?

Who needs to act?

What should happen next?

When is that action due?

What happened the last time someone worked it?

CRIS is designed to keep that operational story together.

A busy team does not always mean work is moving.

RCM teams can be extremely active while revenue remains stuck.

Staff may be:

Calling payers.

Checking portals.

Working denials.

Submitting appeals.

Updating spreadsheets.

Following up balances.

Responding to emails.

Correcting claim issues.

But management may still struggle to answer:

Which accounts are actually progressing?

Which ones are being worked repeatedly without resolution?

Which accounts have gone untouched?

Which denials are ageing?

Which appeals are waiting?

Which balances are becoming harder to recover?

CRIS helps separate activity from progress.

See the work that needs attention today.

Instead of expecting users to search through multiple reports, CRIS can help organise work around what needs action.

For example:

New work

Items that have entered the queue and have not yet been reviewed.

Due today

Claims, denials, appeals or A/R accounts requiring action now.

Overdue

Work that should already have been completed.

Waiting on payer

The organisation has taken action and is waiting for an external response.

Waiting internally

Another department or person must act before work can continue.

High-value

Accounts where delay may have a larger financial impact.

Ageing

Balances becoming older while still unresolved.

Escalated

Items that require additional management attention.

The objective is simple:

Make it difficult for important work to disappear.

Work queuesPrioritised daily work
6 active queues
QueueNew work
Oldest item2 days
Affected value$412K

Items that have entered the queue and have not yet been reviewed.

CLAIM MOVEMENT

Claims should move forward, not simply remain on a list.

A claim has a journey.

CRIS helps teams see where each claim is in that journey. That makes it easier to find claims that have stopped moving.

Claim progressionCLM-483920 · Emily Carter
Stalled 7 days
CreatedSep 2
ReviewedSep 2
SubmittedSep 3
AcceptedSep 4
DeniedSep 12
AppealDue today
ResolvedPending
Where it stoppedDenied · supporting documentation required
OwnerJordan Blake
Next actionPrepare appeal package
DueToday · 2:00 PM
Read the full claim-progression context

Claims should move forward, not simply remain on a list.

A claim has a journey.

It may move through stages such as:

Created

↓

Reviewed

↓

Submitted

↓

Accepted

↓

Processed

↓

Paid

or

Rejected / Denied

↓

Corrected, followed up or appealed

↓

Resolved

CRIS helps teams see where each claim is in that journey.

That makes it easier to find claims that have stopped moving.

Find claims that are stuck before they become old A/R.

The earlier a problem is noticed, the easier it may be to address.

CRIS can help teams identify situations such as:

Claim created but not submitted.

Claim rejected and not corrected.

Claim accepted but no further response received.

Claim denied but no action started.

Claim assigned but not worked.

Appeal submitted but never followed up.

Payment received but balance still open.

Repeated payer follow-up without resolution.

Account approaching a filing or appeal deadline.

Instead of discovering these problems weeks later, teams can bring them into view earlier.

DENIALS & APPEALS

Denials should become work, not just statistics.

CRIS helps turn denial information into operational work.

Appeals should never depend on someone's memory.

Denial & appeal workspaceActionable cases
27 new denials · 11 active appeals

New denials

CO-50 · Medical necessityCLM-483920 · $18,420
Due today
PR-96 · Non-covered chargeCLM-482606 · $12,850
2 days
CO-197 · AuthorizationCLM-481970 · $27,300
3 days

Appeals in progress

APL-11854Submitted Sep 8 · $31,870
Follow-up
APL-11841Documentation requested · $22,600
Due tomorrow
APL-11788Payer response received · $16,240
Review outcome
Repeated reasonAuthorization31% of new denials
Appeal deadline risk4within 48 hours
Denied value$174Knew queue
Oldest unresolved26 dayspayer response
Explore denial and appeal detail

Denials should become work, not just statistics.

Knowing that the organisation has 1,200 denials is useful.

But the operations team needs to know:

Which denials need action?

Which are worth the most?

Which are getting older?

Which can be corrected quickly?

Which need appeals?

Which are waiting for information?

Which reasons keep coming back?

Which payer is creating the issue?

Who owns the next action?

CRIS helps turn denial information into operational work.

One denial should answer five questions.

For every denial, the user should be able to understand:

What happened?

Why was payment denied?

What does it affect?

What claim, account, payer and amount are involved?

What should happen next?

Correction, resubmission, appeal, documentation, payer follow-up or another action.

Who owns it?

The person or team responsible.

When must it be completed?

The due date, deadline or escalation point.

That is more useful than simply showing a denial code.

Repeated denials should stop feeling like isolated events.

A denial may look like one claim problem.

But when the same reason appears again and again, it may indicate a larger operational issue.

CRIS can help users see patterns such as:

The same denial reason increasing.

The same payer repeatedly denying similar claims.

One facility generating more denials than others.

Certain claim types failing more often.

Specific problems returning after previous correction.

A denial that happens once may need follow-up.

A denial that happens hundreds of times may need process improvement.

Appeals should never depend on someone's memory.

An appeal can involve several steps:

The denial is reviewed.

The supporting information is gathered.

The appeal is prepared.

The appeal is submitted.

The payer acknowledges it.

The team waits.

Follow-up becomes due.

The payer responds.

The claim is paid, partially paid, upheld or requires further action.

If these steps are managed through personal reminders or spreadsheets, important appeals can easily age without action.

CRIS helps keep the appeal journey visible.

Know exactly where every appeal stands.

Users should be able to distinguish between:

Appeal needed

The denial has been reviewed and should be challenged.

Being prepared

Documentation or justification is being assembled.

Submitted

The appeal has been sent.

Awaiting response

The payer has not yet responded.

Follow-up due

The expected response period has passed.

Further information requested

Additional documentation or action is required.

Successful

The appeal resulted in the expected resolution.

Partially successful

Some value was recovered, but an issue remains.

Unsuccessful

The denial was upheld.

Closed

The final outcome has been recorded.

No appeal should become invisible simply because it has already been submitted.

A/R & follow-upAccount CLM-482177
96 days
0–30
$1.26M
31–60
$0.98M
61–90
$0.76M
91–120
$0.58M
120+
$0.68M
Sep 4 · Follow-up completedPayer advised claim remains under review.
Sep 11 · Documentation sentRequested clinical support uploaded.
Sep 18 · Follow-up due todayOwner: Emily Carter · $52,400 balance.
Next actionConfirm review status and expected payment date.

A/R & FOLLOW-UP

A/R follow-up should answer more than “Who called the payer?”

Calling the payer is an activity.

The more important question is:

Did the account move closer to resolution?

CRIS helps maintain continuity between one follow-up and the next.

Explore A/R, follow-up and prioritisation detail

A/R follow-up should answer more than “Who called the payer?”

Calling the payer is an activity.

The more important question is:

Did the account move closer to resolution?

A useful follow-up record should make clear:

What was checked.

What the payer said.

What evidence was obtained.

What needs to happen next.

Who needs to do it.

When follow-up is due again.

Whether the account is progressing.

CRIS helps maintain continuity between one follow-up and the next.

The next person should not have to start from the beginning.

Without clear history, follow-up often sounds like this:

“Has anyone worked this account before?”

“What did the payer say last time?”

“Who was supposed to send the document?”

“Was an appeal already submitted?”

“Why is this still open?”

“Who is handling this?”

CRIS keeps the previous work connected to the account so the next user can continue from where the last person stopped.

Every follow-up should produce an outcome.

A follow-up might result in:

Payment expected.

Claim under review.

Additional information required.

Correction needed.

Appeal required.

Resubmission required.

Payment already issued.

Payment amount questioned.

Payer response disputed.

Internal action required.

Further follow-up required.

Case ready for closure.

The goal is to make each touch move the account toward a clear next state.

Old A/R should not become normal.

When teams work from large account lists, older balances can become part of the background.

CRIS helps make ageing visible.

For example:

0–30 days

Newer balances.

31–60 days

Balances requiring closer monitoring.

61–90 days

Accounts beginning to age materially.

91–120 days

Balances requiring stronger intervention.

120+ days

Older unresolved revenue requiring clear explanation and action.

The objective is not simply to show the age.

It is to help teams understand why the account is still open and what will happen next.

Not every account deserves the same priority.

An RCM team may have thousands of outstanding accounts.

Trying to work everything in the same order can waste time.

CRIS can help prioritise work using factors such as:

Age.

Balance.

Denial status.

Payer.

Deadline.

Appeal status.

Last action date.

Number of previous follow-ups.

Expected financial impact.

Work status.

Escalation status.

This allows teams to focus attention where it matters most.

A $50 account and a $50,000 account should not disappear into the same queue.

Both may need action.

But they may not deserve the same operational priority.

CRIS helps users see the financial context of the work they are handling.

That means supervisors can identify:

Large balances with no recent activity.

High-value denials awaiting appeal.

Large accounts approaching deadlines.

Repeatedly followed-up balances with no progress.

High-value claims waiting for internal action.

This creates a clearer connection between daily work and revenue impact.

Know what is waiting on your team and what is waiting on someone else.

Not every delay belongs to billing.

An account may be waiting for:

A provider.

Coding.

Clinical documentation.

Registration correction.

A payer.

Finance.

Authorisation.

Management approval.

Another operational team.

CRIS helps distinguish:

Work we can act on now

from

Work waiting on somebody else.

That distinction matters because the next action is different.

Internal delays should be visible too.

It is easy to blame slow payment on the payer.

But sometimes revenue is waiting because the organisation has not completed its own action.

For example:

Documentation has not been supplied.

A correction has not been made.

An approval is pending.

An appeal has not been submitted.

A claim has not been resubmitted.

A requested review has not been completed.

CRIS helps make those internal bottlenecks visible so the team can act on what it controls.

TEAM EXECUTION

Supervisors should see workload before staff become overwhelmed.

An RCM leader needs to know more than how many accounts exist.

The purpose is not to count clicks. It is to understand whether important work is progressing.

Workload & progressTeam execution
Today
Jordan Blake12822 overdue · 14 high priority
Emily Carter948 overdue · 7 high priority
Sarah Mitchell785 overdue · 12 appeals
Michael Johnson683 overdue · 9 high priority
Worked today284
Progressed217
Resolved96
Reopened12
Bottleneck viewWhy 1,420 claims remain unresolved
Waiting on documentation620
Recurring denial reason340
Waiting on payer response210
No action >14 days150
Ready to close100
Explore ownership, deadlines, bottlenecks and closure controls

Work queues should tell people what to do next.

A work queue should not just be a long table of accounts.

It should help users answer:

What should I work first?

What is due today?

What is overdue?

What is high value?

What has not been touched recently?

What is waiting for my action?

What can I close?

What needs escalation?

That turns a queue into a working tool rather than another report.

Give every item an owner.

When ownership is unclear, work often becomes everyone's responsibility and therefore no one's responsibility.

CRIS can help assign work to:

An individual.

A team.

A supervisor.

A specialist group.

A payer team.

A denial team.

An appeal team.

An A/R team.

That creates a clear answer to:

Who is responsible for moving this forward?

Know when work has been sitting too long.

A claim does not need to be extremely old before it becomes a problem.

CRIS can help expose inactivity such as:

No action for 3 days.

No follow-up for 14 days.

Appeal awaiting response beyond the expected period.

Assigned work never opened.

Payer request not answered.

Internal request still outstanding.

Account repeatedly deferred.

This helps supervisors intervene before inactivity becomes ageing.

Supervisors should see workload before staff become overwhelmed.

An RCM leader needs to know more than how many accounts exist.

They also need to know how work is distributed.

CRIS can help show:

Who has the most open work.

Who has overdue work.

Which team is carrying the largest high-value balances.

Where queues are growing.

Where work is moving slowly.

Where accounts are being closed.

Where escalation is increasing.

That helps supervisors rebalance workload before bottlenecks become permanent.

Activity should be visible without micromanaging people.

The purpose is not to count clicks.

It is to understand whether important work is progressing.

CRIS can help management see:

Work assigned.

Work completed.

Work overdue.

Accounts progressed.

Accounts resolved.

Follow-ups completed.

Appeals submitted.

Appeals awaiting response.

Work escalated.

Balances closed.

This gives managers a clearer view of team execution without requiring constant manual checking.

Know what your team achieved today.

At the end of the day, an RCM manager should be able to answer:

How much work was completed?

How many accounts moved forward?

How many denials were resolved?

How many appeals were submitted?

How many balances were closed?

How much outstanding value was affected?

What remains overdue?

Where is work accumulating?

Who needs support?

Those answers help turn operational activity into management visibility.

A completed task is not always a resolved account.

This distinction matters.

A user may complete a follow-up call.

But the account may still remain unresolved.

A user may submit an appeal.

But the revenue has not yet been recovered.

A claim may be corrected.

But it still needs to be resubmitted.

CRIS helps distinguish:

Task completed

from

Account resolved.

That prevents operational activity from being mistaken for financial outcome.

Closure should mean something.

An account should not simply disappear from the queue.

When work is closed, the organisation should be able to understand why.

For example:

Paid in full.

Corrected and paid.

Appeal successful.

Partially recovered.

Adjustment accepted.

No further recovery expected.

Duplicate removed.

Balance transferred appropriately.

Issue resolved through another process.

Closing with a clear outcome improves reporting and prevents the same account from repeatedly returning without explanation.

Keep the history behind the outcome.

Imagine an account moves through this journey:

Claim submitted.

↓

Denied.

↓

Assigned to denial specialist.

↓

Documentation requested.

↓

Appeal prepared.

↓

Appeal submitted.

↓

Payer follow-up completed.

↓

Payment received.

↓

Residual balance reviewed.

↓

Account closed.

CRIS is designed to preserve that story.

Not just the final status.

When someone asks, “What happened with this account?” the answer should already exist.

Without connected history, teams often have to search through:

Emails.

Portal notes.

Spreadsheets.

Shared folders.

Call logs.

Individual memory.

Separate reports.

CRIS is designed to bring the operational history closer together so the account can explain itself.

Turn repeated follow-up into useful intelligence.

If the team has contacted the same payer six times for the same account, that information matters.

If hundreds of claims require the same type of correction, that matters.

If one appeal type consistently succeeds, that matters.

If one denial reason repeatedly returns after correction, that matters.

CRIS helps convert operational history into patterns that management can learn from.

Know where the work is slowing down.

Every revenue cycle has points where work can accumulate.

For example:

Before claim submission.

After rejection.

After denial.

Before appeal.

After appeal submission.

During payer follow-up.

During internal document requests.

During payment investigation.

During final account resolution.

CRIS helps show where work is building up so managers can investigate why.

Bottlenecks become easier to fix when you can see them.

Suppose management sees:

1,420 unresolved claims.

That number alone does not tell them what to do.

CRIS may help reveal that:

620 are waiting on documentation.

340 are denied for the same recurring reason.

210 are waiting for payer response.

150 have had no action for more than 14 days.

100 are ready for closure.

Now the problem becomes much more manageable.

One queue should lead to one clear action.

Instead of showing everyone everything, CRIS can help organise work into practical queues such as:

Claims needing review

Rejected claims

New denials

Denials needing correction

Appeals to prepare

Appeals awaiting payer response

A/R follow-up due

High-value balances

Overdue work

Internal action required

Accounts ready to close

The user should not have to interpret an entire revenue cycle before knowing what to do next.

Good operations depend on deadlines.

Some work becomes less valuable when it is done too late.

Appeal deadlines may expire.

Follow-up opportunities may be missed.

Claims may age.

Documentation may become harder to obtain.

Balances may become increasingly difficult to recover.

CRIS helps teams work with due dates, ageing and escalation so important actions are not left indefinitely.

Escalation should happen before a problem becomes permanent.

Some accounts require extra attention because:

The value is high.

The deadline is close.

Multiple follow-ups have failed.

The payer has not responded.

An internal dependency remains unresolved.

The account is becoming very old.

A recurring issue is affecting many claims.

CRIS can help move those cases from routine work into management attention.

Managers should not have to ask staff for updates one account at a time.

Instead of:

“Where are we on this claim?”

“What happened with that denial?”

“Did anyone follow up that appeal?”

“Who owns this balance?”

“When was the payer last contacted?”

CRIS is designed to make those answers visible in the work itself.

CONNECTED OPERATING JOURNEY

From claim to closure, keep the work connected.

At every stage:

Someone owns the work.

A next action is visible.

A due date can be understood.

The history remains available.

Different responsibilities. One connected story.

01Claim entersNew revenue-cycle work
→
02AssignedOwner and priority
→
03Action takenReview, submit or follow up
→
04ResponsePayer or internal outcome
→
05Issue handledCorrection, appeal or escalation
→
06Payment / resolutionFinancial outcome recorded
→
07Balance reviewedResidual amount understood
→
08ClosedOutcome and evidence retained
Explore the connected operating story

Give the team one operational story.

Billing may see the claim.

Denials may see the rejection reason.

Appeals may see the correspondence.

A/R may see the outstanding balance.

Finance may see the payment.

Management may see the KPI.

CRIS helps connect these views around the same underlying revenue-cycle event.

Different responsibilities.

One connected story.

Staff should understand why their work matters.

A queue item is not just another line on a screen.

Behind it may be:

Revenue waiting to be collected.

A denial that can still be overturned.

An account approaching a deadline.

A payer issue affecting hundreds of other claims.

A balance that has already been followed up repeatedly.

A process failure that keeps returning.

CRIS helps keep the financial and operational context visible around the work.

Give users the context before they act.

Before working an account, the user may need to see:

Current status.

Amount involved.

Payer.

Age.

Denial reason.

Previous actions.

Last follow-up.

Outstanding requests.

Appeal status.

Next due date.

Assigned owner.

Relevant evidence.

This reduces the time spent searching before useful work can begin.

Less searching. Less repeating. Less forgotten work.

A stronger RCM operating environment should reduce situations such as:

Staff calling the same payer without knowing someone called yesterday.

Two people working the same account.

Appeals being prepared twice.

Important balances sitting unassigned.

Follow-ups being missed.

Management manually combining spreadsheets.

Users rebuilding account history from notes.

Work being marked complete while the account remains unresolved.

CRIS is designed to make daily work easier to follow.

Different teams can work from the same revenue-cycle journey.

Billing team

Prepare, review and progress claims.

Denials team

Understand why payment was refused and determine the next action.

Appeals team

Challenge appropriate denials and track the outcome.

A/R team

Follow outstanding balances through to resolution.

Supervisors

Monitor workload, ageing, overdue work and team execution.

Revenue cycle leadership

Understand where work is accumulating and where revenue is exposed.

Each role sees the context it needs without losing the connection to the whole process.

From claim to closure, keep the work connected.

The CRIS RCM operating journey can be understood simply:

Claim enters the process

↓

Work is assigned

↓

Action is taken

↓

Response is received

↓

Issue is identified

↓

Correction, follow-up or appeal happens

↓

Payment or resolution occurs

↓

Remaining balance is reviewed

↓

Outcome is confirmed

↓

Account is closed

At every stage:

Someone owns the work.

A next action is visible.

A due date can be understood.

The history remains available.

Stop managing revenue-cycle work by memory.

CRIS helps billing and RCM teams move from:

Personal spreadsheets.

Unclear ownership.

Manual reminders.

Scattered account notes.

Repeated follow-up.

Hidden overdue work.

Unclear queues.

Disconnected reports.

to a more controlled operating model where users can see:

What needs attention.

Why it needs attention.

Who owns it.

When it is due.

What happened previously.

And what will close it.

DAILY OPERATIONS COMMAND CENTER

Start the day knowing exactly what matters.

That is the kind of operational clarity CRIS is designed to provide.

Revenue Cycle OperationsDaily Control Center
Sep 19 · 8:45 AM
Open work1,420−4.8% vs last week
Overdue1188.3% of open work
90+ Day A/R$486K72 accounts
Denied value$174K27 new denials
Resolved today96$318K affected

Work received vs completed

W1W2W3W4W5W6
ReceivedCompleted

Needs management attention

Documentation backlog620 unresolved claims
Growing
Appeal deadlines4 due within 48 hours
Urgent
High-value inactivity9 accounts with no action >14 days
Review
Ready to close100 accounts with resolved outcome
Clear
Read the start-of-day and end-of-day operating view

Start the day knowing exactly what matters.

An operational user opening CRIS should be able to answer:

What do I need to work today?

What is overdue?

What has the highest priority?

Which accounts are waiting on me?

Which claims have stopped moving?

Which denials need action?

Which appeals need follow-up?

Which balances are getting too old?

What can be closed?

What needs escalation?

That is the kind of operational clarity CRIS is designed to provide.

End the day knowing what actually moved.

Managers should be able to see:

What was completed.

What progressed.

What was resolved.

What remains open.

What became overdue.

What was escalated.

What requires tomorrow's attention.

What financial value remains affected.

Operational control becomes easier when progress is visible.

Bring a real work queue to the demonstration.

Ask CRIS questions such as:

See all demonstration questions

Bring a real work queue to the demonstration.

Ask CRIS questions such as:

“Which claims have not moved recently?”

“Which denials need action today?”

“Which appeals are overdue for follow-up?”

“Which high-value accounts have no recent activity?”

“Which balances are older than 90 days?”

“What is waiting on an internal team?”

“Which denial reasons keep repeating?”

“Who owns this account?”

“What did the payer say last time?”

“What is the next action?”

“Which work is overdue?”

“Which accounts can be closed?”

The demonstration should show how CRIS moves from the operational signal to the account, its history, its owner and its next action.

Request an RCM Operations Demo

Explore CRIS RCM

Explore Workflow & Action Management

Ask CRISOperational questions
Investigation pathStalled-claim signal → affected claims → last activity → owner → next action.

Every claim should move. Every denial should have an action. Every balance should have an owner.

CRIS helps billing and revenue-cycle teams organise claims, denials, appeals, A/R and follow-up into visible, accountable daily work.

See the work. Move the work. Close the loop.