Skip to content
CRIS

REVENUE INTEGRITY

How to investigate underpayments and revenue leakage without overstating recovery

A disciplined approach to payment variance, possible underpayments, substantiated underpayments, leakage and verified recovery.

12 min read Finance, revenue integrity, revenue-cycle leaders, executives Updated September 2026
01

Not every payment difference is an underpayment

A payment can differ from an expected amount for legitimate reasons, including contract terms, policy rules, patient responsibility, bundling, adjustments or limitations in the organization’s expected-reimbursement model. Revenue integrity starts with a variance, then investigates whether the variance is explainable.

02

Use a controlled classification sequence

  1. Expected reimbursement is calculated.

  2. Actual payment and adjustments are matched.

  3. A variance is identified.

  4. Contract, payer rule and claim context are reviewed.

  5. The variance is classified as explained, unresolved or possible underpayment.

  6. Supporting evidence is gathered.

  7. A substantiated underpayment is pursued where appropriate.

  8. Recovery is recorded only when payment is actually received or otherwise verified.

03

Useful terminology

TermPractical meaning
Payment varianceDifference between expected and observed financial outcome.
Possible underpaymentA variance that appears inconsistent with expectation but is not yet fully substantiated.
Substantiated underpaymentEvidence supports that additional payment is due under the applicable arrangement.
Revenue leakageRevenue lost or not realized because of process, contractual, payment or operational failure; the category should be defined carefully by the organization.
Recovery opportunityA substantiated item that may be pursued.
Verified recoveryAdditional value actually recovered and evidenced.
04

Evidence matters

  • Original claim and service detail.
  • Applicable contract or expected-reimbursement rule.
  • Remittance and adjustment reason.
  • Payment posting.
  • Payer communication.
  • Appeal or reconsideration documentation.
  • Final payer response.
  • Evidence of any additional payment received.
05

Avoid inflated recovery reporting

Potential exposure, substantiated opportunity and verified recovery should be reported separately. Combining them can make a program appear more successful than the evidence supports. Management should be able to see how values move from one state to another.

06

Look for recurring leakage patterns

Individual payment variances may reveal a larger pattern when they cluster by payer, contract, procedure, facility, provider, service line or time period. Pattern analysis can help distinguish a one-off claim issue from a systematic payment or process problem.

CRIS RESOURCE CENTRE

Keep learning, or bring the question to a demonstration.

Use the Resource Centre to understand the problem first. When you are ready, a CRIS demonstration can show how the same question moves from management signal to evidence, action and outcome.

Browse all resourcesRequest a CRIS Demo